planet earth looks blue

&
 

May 11 2009

Terrorism Questionable in Sri Lanka

Published by bstone at 7:55 am under World Edit This

tamil-tigers.jpg 

What is the international definition of terrorism?  The US definition states that terrorism is “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents.”  The key word here is ‘noncombatant”.  Although the label of terrorists on basically all groups could be called into question, today, a ray of light needs to be shed on the situation in Sri Lanka.

 

The Tamil Tigers are considered a terrorist group by India, America, the EU, and Canada.  But are they?  Aren’t they the literal definition of freedom fighters?  The Tigers are the revolutionary group, started in the 1980’s with the purpose of seceding from Sri Lanka, formerly known a Ceylon.  Tamil is a separate ethnic group within the country, that has been trying to secede from the country.  They are separatists, fine, but terrorists, no.  A separate state was proposed back in 1976.

 

The Tamils want a small portion of the north and east of Sri Lanka, to form an independent nation, Tamil Eelam, ruled by their people, for their interests.  The fighting has been going on for decades, but over the past year it has been an all out year.  Virtually no media is allowed into the country, banned by the Sri Lankan government, and there is scant international presence at all.  There are camps outside of the conflict zone where some civilians are staying  According to the UN, 186,000 are housed in camps, 1,700 who are severely wounded are in hospitals, and 50,000 more are within the conflict area.  Yesterday was the day everyone in the international community feared, the day they did nothing to prevent - hundreds of innocent people died in one blood bath.  The numbers range from around 600, to a body count of 1,200, with at least 100 children.  According to the Tigers, the government basically went on a campaign of aerial bombing and heavy artillery fire.  The government says the Tigers turned on their own people and are responsible for the killing.

 

The number of civilian casualties is unknown, and the circumstances are unclear, but the burden of proof rests on those who will not allow an international presence.  It is hard to believe that this was anything other than the military trying to end this conflict once and for all before the next elections, as not everyone supports the violence.  But because many western nations allow the Tigers to fall under the umbrella term of terrorists, the voice in defense of the Tamil Tigers is silenced.  

 

Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

3 Responses to “Terrorism Questionable in Sri Lanka”

  1. huttriveron 11 May 2009 at 8:43 pm edit this

    I support your questioning of the term terrorist in relation to the Tamil Tigers. I have always believed they were part of a campaign against a dominant racial grouping in power in Sri Lanka, but the West regards them as a terrorist group opposing the government there in Sri Lanka. It would take a concerted publicity campaign to get their point across to the so-called free world.

    Might look at it, research and post in my Huttriver8 Blog sometime. http://huttriver8.blogspot.com

    Cheers,

    Peter

  2. Emmyel (Manchester Uni)on 15 May 2009 at 10:54 am edit this

    I disagree with the view that terror violence in Sri Lanka by Tamil Tigers is fight against oppressive government. Again, l refuse to accept that Tamil Tigers are separatists group fighting for political and economic freedom of their people.
    In my view, Tamil Tigers are clandestine group fighting a rational cause in a very irrational manner. It is morally wrong to fight a just cause by unjust means. To what extent can we say that Tamil Tigers have changed the condition of the people they claimed to represent? What is the wisdom in fighting a self-defeating war? The death toll of innocent civilian citizens is completely unacceptable. Tamil Tigers seems to comprise people that detaste dialogue as a veritable means of conflict resolution. Their inablity to use diplomacy and amicable solutions to make their government concede political change seems morally foolish.
    To say that Tamil Tigers age-long terror against the sates is otherwise freedom fighting is rather too padestrian and it is only those who have failed to understand the problem of terror violence in modern society could see the activities of Tamil Tigers since 1978 or so as a fight against oppressive government in Sri Lanka. We should tell ourselves the home truth.

  3. huttriveron 17 May 2009 at 8:36 pm edit this

    Well, whatever, its really all over bar the shouting. There are a lot of women and children who will need looking after?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply